Correctional Counselor (CC1) Practice Exam

If an I/M lacks qualifying offenses for automatic VIO AD application, what should the classification committee do?

1. Conduct a full investigation of the I/M's history

2. Refer the case to a CSR for VIO AD removal

3. Approve the VIO AD without review

4. Issue a summary judgment against the I/M

The correct answer is: Refer the case to a CSR for VIO AD removal

The correct answer is to refer the case to a CSR for VIO AD removal. In situations where an inmate or individual in custody (I/M) does not have qualifying offenses that meet the criteria for automatic violation of conditions of alternative discharge (VIO AD), it is essential for the classification committee to ensure that proper procedures are followed. Referring the case to a Classification Staff Representative (CSR) allows for a more detailed and focused review. The CSR can assess the specifics of the case regarding the inmate's history, any circumstances surrounding the offenses, and adherence to institutional policies, ensuring that any decision made aligns with best practices and regulations. This approach is consistent with ensuring accountability and maintaining due process, allowing the CSR to make an informed decision based on the facts of the case. The other options do not align with proper protocol for handling this situation. For instance, conducting a full investigation may not be necessary if the criteria for automatic application are not met, while approving the VIO AD without a thorough review bypasses the necessary verification process. Issuing a summary judgment would be inappropriate given the lack of qualifying offenses, as it does not allow for the necessary due process or consideration of the inmate's individual circumstances.