Under what conditions might an inmate be allowed to live in non-secure facilities or attend programs outside of the perimeter?

The correct answer is grounded in the assessment of an inmate's risk level, particularly in relation to their potential for violence. A Board of Parole Hearings (BPH) evaluation that indicates a low risk of violence suggests that the inmate has demonstrated a stable behavior pattern and may be rehabilitated to the extent that they can participate in less restrictive programs or live in non-secure facilities.

Programs outside the perimeter often cater to inmates who have shown a commitment to rehabilitation and who pose little threat to public safety. The BPH’s evaluation takes into account various factors such as the inmate's past behavior, the nature of their offenses, and any participation in rehabilitative programs. A low risk rating indicates trustworthiness and an ability to engage with society without unnecessary risk.

In contrast, conditions like having a high preliminary score, a current violent offense, or involvement in public interest cases do not directly correlate with a reduction in risk or indicate suitability for non-secure facilities. A high preliminary score typically signals a need for greater monitoring, while a current violent offense would strongly suggest the opposite of rehabilitation. Public interest involvement does not necessarily reflect an inmate's risk profile in the context of facility placement.